You’ve searched and searched for the perfect candidate. Resumes and interviews narrowed the talent pool to the best candidates. The only problem: You have found the best qualities… in two people. You can only pick one, so how do you choose? Eighty percent of organization turnover is a result of poor hiring decisions. The candidates are perfect on paper and have the charisma of President John F. Kennedy during the initial interviews. These tips shed some light on making the right decision.
Two Heads are Better than One
It never hurts to ask for help. Asking another experienced professional or coworker can give additional insight to a candidate’s cultural or professional fit in the company. The fresh perspective exposes some candidate qualities you were unaware of. Conduct a second round of interviews in which you participate very little if at all. The interview board will have a more objective perspective on the candidate’s fit to company mission critical skills.
A collaborative second interview gives a wider view of the candidate to the hiring team. Fifty percent of candidates who apply for a position will get a second interview. You can reduce this rate by giving the initial interview more weight in the hiring process. A narrower second interview can make the decision to hire easier.
Future
It is crucial to know the immediate or future needs of the company before initiating the hiring process. The surprising catalyst is companies don’t always know what they want in a new hire. Even before reading resumes, 25 percent of hiring managers don’t know corporate needs. Knowing more important needs of the organization can save a lot of heartache when the time comes to make a decision between two candidates.
Should you hire Mr. Right or Mr. Right Now? The size and growth of the company has a direct impact on which you decide. A company that is growing quickly needs to hire a candidate who has ambition for growth. Mr. Right has the charismatic traits to fit a future role in leadership. While charisma matters, it isn’t the only thing to take into consideration when it comes to picking the perfect candidate.
Hiring for potential, which is sometimes a wise decision, might not always be the right decision. Established companies have their CEOs, CMOs, and the rest of their chiefs of staff; they already have their leadership. Mr. Right Now has the characteristics of a role that serves its purpose right now. They don’t necessarily have the potential for higher leadership, but that’s okay. Established companies need talented people to fill the gaps within their ranks to solve a current need.
Originally posted on Recruiter.com
photo credit: attercop311 via photopin cc